See what you can build with certainty in seconds.

Explore development options with the property facts, planning rules and sources behind them. Use PropCode Pro to decide which options to pursue and what to check before committing to a design.

One property: $82.50 inc GST. Property packs available.

Pro report: NSW CDC. RPR: NSW DA, VIC, ACT and TAS.

Pro report exampleNSW · CDC

Dual occupancy (attached)

Low Rise Housing Diversity Code
No part of one dwelling above another

Likely eligible12 rule checks to confirm
Floor area
464 m²
Height
8.5 m

Smallest lot if subdivided: 225 m²

Dwelling house

Housing Code
A new home on the selected lot

Likely eligible9 rule checks to confirm
Floor area
335 m²
Height
8.5 m

Open the option to inspect the applicable design rules.

Multi dwelling housing (terraces)

Low Rise Housing Diversity Code
The same lot, a different width requirement

Fails: lot-width requirementThis lot is 1.06 m short of the 21 m minimum.
Lot width
19.94 m
Required width
21 m
Codes SEPP · cl 3B.33(2)

Sample report — illustrative values. Results depend on the property, configuration and pathway.

One lot, different options. Compare the limits and the checks behind each result.

See the Pro report in 90 seconds.

What you can build, then one example from search to the clause behind each answer.

Play video — a walkthrough of the Pro report
Sample · 32 Holden Street, Maroubra NSW

Three planning tools. One property purchase.

Assess complying development, research other planning pathways and ask the next question. Pro includes all three tools for your selected property, with access for your team.

Pro report

Check the complying development route.

Compare NSW CDC options for your property. See which land requirements pass, what needs confirmation and which rules will shape the design.

Likely eligibleOpen the checks behind the result.
Land requirementsNext checksDesign rules

NSW · CDC pathway

Rapid Planning Report

Research your development options.

Investigate what you could develop, test a proposed use or research subdivision controls. Follow the analysis back to its planning sources.

What could I develop here?Choose the research that fits the question.
Development optionsSpecific useSubdivision controls

NSW DA · VIC · ACT · TAS

Explore Rapid Planning Report
PropChat

Ask the next question.

Keep investigating with your property in context. Ask a follow-up planning question and open the sources used in the answer.

“Where should I check local flooding?”

Start with council’s property-specific information.Example source · Randwick DCP B8

The detail that changes the answer.

Pro connects the property fact, the applicable rule and the result. Change the lot width or parking access to see which requirement applies.

Ten centimetres can make the difference.

With parking accessed from the primary road, this attached dual occupancy needs a lot at least 15 m wide at the building line. Try 14.90 m, then change the parking access to a lane. The width stays the same; the applicable rule changes.

  1. 01
    The property fact

    Width measured at the building line.

  2. 02
    The rule that applies

    The parking-access arrangement determines the minimum width.

  3. 03
    The effect on eligibility

    See the check that changes the result, then open its source.

Attached dual occupancyNSW · CDC

Width at the building line

Parking accessPrimary road

19.94 m lot at the building line, with parking accessed from the primary road. Schematic illustration.Dwelling1Dwelling219.94 mPrimary roadPP
Lot-width check: Passes19.94 m exceeds the 15 m minimum.Codes SEPP · cl 3B.8(2)(b)

Parking accessPrimary road

14.90 m lot at the building line, with parking accessed from the primary road. Schematic illustration.Dwelling1Dwelling214.90 mPrimary roadPP
Lot-width check: Fails14.90 m is below the 15 m minimum.Codes SEPP · cl 3B.8(2)(b)

Parking accessRear lane only

14.90 m lot at the building line, with parking accessed only from a rear lane. Schematic illustration.Rear laneDwelling1Dwelling214.90 mPrimary roadPP
Lot-width check: Passes14.90 m exceeds the 12 m minimum.Codes SEPP · cl 3B.8(2)(a)

Illustrative scenarios, not a site plan. Passing this width check does not establish overall eligibility.

“The simplicity of the online analysis reports has been a life saver.”
Nicole RedmanRegistered Certifier · North Coast CertificationsRead the full testimonial

Open the detail behind the decision.

See which land requirements pass, what still needs confirmation and which design rules apply. Pro keeps the work behind the eligibility result available for review.

32 checks passed. Here’s what comes next.

In this example, 12 further checks need an answer. Pro identifies the missing facts and explains where to find them, so the follow-up work is specific.

Explore the 42 design rules by topic, with source references and relevant table rows highlighted for the lot.

Inspect a complete sample
Attached dual occupancyNSW · CDC

Land requirements

Passes
32 checks
Needs an answer
12 checks
Doesn’t apply
6 checks
Inspect one passed check: lot width

Original width: 19.94 m. This example satisfies the 15 m threshold used for its vehicle-access arrangement.

Codes SEPP 2008 · cl 3B.8(2)

The 44 assessed checks comprise 32 passes and 12 unresolved checks. A further six requirements do not apply.

What to check next

Have the planning certificate?

Pro provides a PDF upload to help fill gaps in the property information.

Is this a flood control lot?
Not known

Check the section 10.7 planning certificate for council’s flood-related controls.

Codes SEPP · cl 3B.5(1)
Is this lot a draft heritage item?
Not known

Confirm with council whether an exhibited draft plan identifies the lot.

Two of 15 fact questions in this example. Several facts may inform one rule check.

Design rules

42 rules grouped by the design questions they answer.

Setbacks
10 rules
Landscaping
4 rules
Car parking
4 rules
Torrens subdivision
3 rules
See which conditions matter.

Setback requirements can change with lot width, building height and boundary type. Read the applicable rule and its conditions together.

Selected topics from this option. Two design rules in the inspected report wait on an answer.

Sample report — illustrative values. Counts belong to one option, not every Pro report.

When an option fails, know why.

See the failed requirement, its source and the property information behind it. For mapped constraints, see how much of the lot is affected.

10 Oxford Street, EppingNSW · CDC

Commercial premises
Internal alterations to an existing building

Fails: heritage item requirementThe inspected report identifies a heritage constraint across the lot.
Schematic of a whole-lot heritage constraintHatching covers the entire example lot. This is a diagram of the reported extent, not a survey or actual map.

100% of the lotHeritage map extentSchematic · not a survey

Codes SEPP · cl 1.17A(1)(d)(iii)

Pinpoint the issue before you go further.

Here, the heritage constraint covers the whole lot. Use the cited requirement to discuss the site with your certifier, or investigate a DA pathway with Rapid Planning Report.

Explore DA research

Put the report to the test.

Open the complete Pro sample for 32 Holden Street, Maroubra. Follow an option from its result to the rules, property facts and remaining checks behind it.

No email or account required. The sample starts with dwelling-house options; select dual occupancy to explore that use.

This sample uses a different lot from the interactive examples, with its own property facts and results.

Which planning question are you trying to answer?

“Can I use complying development?”

For NSW complying development, start with the Pro report. Compare relevant residential, Pattern Book, business or industrial options and inspect the requirements.

Find a property for Pro

“What are my development options?”

Use Rapid Planning Report for NSW DA research, or planning research in VIC, ACT and TAS. Investigate development options, a proposed use or subdivision controls.

Start a planning report
Does “likely eligible” mean my project is approved?

No. It reflects the checks shown for that option. Review the outstanding property facts and applicable design rules with your project team or certifier. Pro does not create or certify a building design or grant an approval.

Can I provide information that the maps don’t contain?

Yes. Pro identifies missing facts and provides controls to supply answers. A planning-certificate upload is also available to help fill gaps. Review the supplied information and any remaining checks.

Can I download and share the report?

Pro provides PDF download and report-sharing controls, and your team can use the property unlocked with Pro. A shared link opens the base report; temporary changes to property facts are not carried into the recipient’s view. Keep the inputs you relied on with your project records.

Claude can research planning rules. What does Pro add?

Judge the work behind the answer. Pro lets you inspect the property facts, rules and source references supporting an option, alongside unresolved checks and design requirements.

It’s a maintained planning product, continually improved by planners. Open the sample and compare the depth of the report with the research you need to complete.

Could I build a planning checker myself?

Building a checker also means maintaining documents and maps, handling exceptions, testing rule changes and making the results reviewable. Pro brings that ongoing work into a product that planners and certifiers already use. Assess it on a property you know.

How do I know whether it fits our team’s work?

Bring a straightforward completed job, an excluded site and a case with an awkward condition to a working demo. Compare the findings and sources with your files, and assess the time it takes to reach a reviewed answer.

Book a working demo

See it on a property you know.